If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact us at email@example.com.
Early Visual Processing in Autism Spectrum Disorder as Assessed by Visual Evoked Potentials
AuthorLeslie Fournier, Natalie F
AdvisorHutlser, Jeffrey J
AltmetricsView Usage Statistics
Understanding early visual processing and the integrity of the visual pathways in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) could help to develop a potential neuromarker. If these early stages of visual perception are compromised it could be impacting higher cognitive abilities that are necessary for social perception. For example, atypical visual behaviors such as poor eye gaze, difficulty with facial expression, and difficulty processing motion have been highly documented in social and nonsocial domains in ASD. These symptoms have been linked to abnormal sensory processing suggesting possible impairments in the magnocellular visual pathway (M-pathway). To assess early visual processing and the integrity of the visual pathways we used achromatic pattern-reversal along with a motion-onset and offset stimuli in children and adolescents with and without a diagnosis of ASD. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) were used to investigate early visual processing in adolescents with ASD compared to neurotypicals (NTs). For pattern-reversal, we used a black-and-white checkerboard with two different sizes (1° and 0.25°) and four different contrast levels (0.025 contrast, 0.05 contrast, 0.1 contrast, and 0.98 contrast). To study motion-onset and offset we used an expanding and contracting ‘dartboard.’ These stimuli were displayed to a total of seven male ASD and eight male NT subjects, ranging in age from 10-15 years old. VEPs were recorded on the scalp midline over the occipital (Oz) and parietal (Pz) cortices. For pattern-reversal, we examined the negative component N75, and the positive component P100. For motion-onset and motion-offset, we explored the positive component P100 and the negative component N135. VEPs responses were analyzed using measures of peak latency, peak amplitude, mean amplitude, and fractional area latency. Our results point to a disruption of the M-pathway where the ASD subjects often showed hyper-responsiveness to lower contrast stimuli presented at the largest check size. Individual waveforms in ASD subjects were variable, and may not be useful as a reliable early neuromarker. Some measures of the VEP seem to be related to symptom severity as assessed by the GARS-2, although these results never reached significance. For motion-onset, the ASD group presented larger amplitudes for the components P100 and N135 at electrode size Oz. Alterations to early visual processing in the ASD group suggest specific difficulties in the magnocellular system which could be causing a cascade of symptoms that impairs social communication. Although individual waveform variability limits the use of VEPs as a neuromarker, there is some potential relationship to symptom severity that deserves further study.