If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Analytical Investigation into Bridge Column Innovations for Mitigating Earthquake Damage
AltmetricsView Usage Statistics
Current seismic bridge design is based on columns designed to be the sacrificial elements during earthquake excitation. This design philosophy capacity protects the bridge foundations, connections and superstructures while causing a lot of damage to the columns during large seismic events. Despite that this concept proved to be successful in bridge collapse prevention and life safety, it causes excessive residual displacement, extensive concrete cracking, cover spalling, rebar buckling, and residual strains in concrete and steel reinforcement. Conventionally designed and detailed reinforced concrete bridge columns can achieve large inelastic deformations without significant loss of vertical or lateral load capacity, but may have significant post-earthquake damage. In many cases, this damage required long-term closure of highways while expensive repairs, or even complete replacement, are carried out. The past two decades witnessed extensive research that developed new design and detailing methods to include new design details and new materials. Despite the extensive effort exerted in such detailing and innovations, little application has been observed in real bridge construction and few code provisions have been changed to include limiting bridge damage. As Nevada is considered the second most seismically active state in the continental U.S and possesses a highway system at full capacity in many locations and has limited redundancy in other places, it is essential to develop bridge designs that limit or eliminate the damage. This report spans the gap between the research and practical application of the new innovations to actual bridges with specific Nevada bridges in mind. Innovations included Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC), Strength Memory Alloys (SMA), prestressing and debonding reinforcement. It investigates the behavior, advantages and disadvantages of each proposed detail and answers the question whether such innovation will be useful to bridge design and damage mitigation through a sophisticated analytical study of a full-scale model that is exposed to different earthquake excitations matching different Nevada design response spectrums. Analytical results and column detail recommendations are provided.
Report No. CCEER-17-07