If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact us at scholarworks@unr.edu.
CCEER 01-6: Experimental Study and Analysis of Retrofitted Flexure and Shear Dominated Circular Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns Subjected to Shake Table Excitation
-
CCEER-01-06.pdf
View/ Download
CCEER-01-06.pdf (8.854Mb)
-
CCEER-01-06.pdf
Date
2001-06-01Type
ReportAbstract
This study presents the experimental and analytical study of four 1/3rdscale
circular flexural dominated and two 1/3rd-scale circular shear dominated
1971 Caltrans detailed bridge columns subjected to shake table loading. The
benchmark as-built flexural column reached it�s design capacity but failed as
expected due to severe lap-splice failure at very low ductility. A second as-built
flexural column was retrofitted with a steel jacket and subjected to multiple El
Centro earthquake motions. The column performed well but the lap-splice slipped
before the full flexural capacity was reached. A third as-built flexural column was
retrofitted with a steel jacket and subjected to a large initial El Centro motion with
subsequent aftershocks. The column performed well but failed to reach post
yielding strains in the lap-splice region. A fourth as-built column was retrofitted
with a carbon fiber wrap and subjected to multiple El Centro amplitudes until failure.
The carbon wrap performed significantly better than the steel jacket retrofits,
providing higher lap-splice bar strains and larger displacement ductility. Measured
stiffness for all flexural columns were less than calculated using standard
moment curvature procedures. Non-linear time history analysis was performed to
compare the calculated and measured response, predicting force levels well but
under-predicting the higher displacement responses. The two shear-dominated
columns were tested in double curvature using a unique dual-link system. A
severe shear failure followed by total collapse occurred at 3.25 x El Centro for the
first column subjected to incremental earthquake motions. The second column
ii
subjected to a large initial motion also failed at 3.25 El Centro but was not followed
by a total collapse. Current shear capacity equations were used to compare
measured versus calculated capacity. The Caltrans equation including the
effect of strain rate closely matched the measured shear capacity. Current shear
stiffness calculations matched well with measured stiffness. Non-linear time history
analysis was performed using hysteretic models created from the shear
capacity equations. The non-linear dynamic models failed to capture the ultimate
conditions of the shear columns.
Description
Report No. CCEER 01-6
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/11714/7109Subject
CCEERAdditional Information
Rights | In Copyright |
---|---|
Rights Holder | Authors |
Collections
- CCEER - Research Reports [249]