University of Nevada, Reno
If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact (rohit@unr.edu). We will work to respond to each request in as timely a manner as possible.
A Parametric Study of Cognitive Defusion and the Believability and Discomfort of Negative Self-Relevant Thoughts
Author
Masuda, AkihikoHayes, Steven C.
Twohig, Michael P.
Drossel, Claudia
Lillis, Jason
Washio, Yukiko
Date
2009Type
ArticleDOI
10.1177/0145445508326259
Statistics
View Usage StatisticsThe full text of the article is available at:
Abstract
A previous time-series study showed that rapidly repeating a single-word version of a negative self-referential thought reduced the discomfort and the believability associated with that thought. The present parametric study examined whether durations of word repetition were differentially effective in altering the discomfort and believability of negative self-referential thought. In two studies, both discomfort and believability varied systematically with the duration of word repetition. The effects of rapid repetition on emotional discomfort bottomed out after 3 s to 10 s of rapid repetition, whereas the effects on believability did so after 20 s to 30 s of repetition. This study lends support to the cognitive defusion interpretation of the effect of word repetition, suggesting that emotional discomfort and believability may be distinctive functional aspects of cognitive events.