If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact us at scholarworks@unr.edu.
The Secret Laws of Arkansas The History and Economics of Split Judical Districts
Date
2014Type
ThesisDepartment
Judicial Studies
Degree Level
Master's Degree
Abstract
In the years between 1875 and 1913 the Arkansas State Legislature passed a series of Acts which divided thirteen counties into judicial districts now referred to as split districts. These Acts were never codified and, although they are still valid law, their contents are virtually unknown to the public officials who are responsible for implementing their provisions and nearly inaccessible to the public. Many of these Acts went far beyond the stated purpose of creating judicial jurisdictions and divided the finances of the counties and created other administrative responsibilities. The impact of the failure to codify the law is, first and foremost, making compliance with the provisions of the law impossible. But the failure has also given rise to a wide misconception that these counties have two county seats of government and this belief has become so ingrained in State culture that it operates as a barrier to the elimination of the districts. It is virtually a "third rail" that politicians and judges fear to touch.The historic basis for the creation of these split judicial districts has never been examined in any systematic way nor has the necessity for their continued existence been reviewed. The author contends that the rationale for the creation of the districts was based in political struggles for the location of the county seats and devised by politicians to circumvent the provisions of the State Constitution's limitations on the creation of new counties or county seats. These political struggles were grounded in local economic conditions and today the continued existence of these districts imposes an unnecessary economic burden on the taxpayers of these counties. It is further contended that there is a discernible pattern in events that lead to the creation of the split districts and the author further concludes that the local option to eliminate these districts should be restored through legislation. 
Permanent link
http://hdl.handle.net/11714/2939Additional Information
Committee Member | Whayne, Jeannie; Lineberger, John |
---|---|
Rights | In Copyright(All Rights Reserved) |
Rights Holder | Author(s) |
Collections
Metadata
Show full item recordRelated items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
.
.
.
Hydrothermal Footprint of Carlin-type Gold Deposits at the District Scale: Jerritt Canyon Mining District, Elko County, Nevada
Patterson, Lucia M. (2009)Carlin-type gold deposits in Nevada are among the leading gold producing deposits in the United States and constitute 8% of world production, making the United States one of the leading gold producing countries in the ... -
.
.
.
Newspaper Coverage of Potable Water Recycling at Orange County Water District's Groundwater Replenishment System, 2000-2016
Ormerod, Kerri J.; Silvia, Leann (2017)Water planners in water-strapped communities in the western United States and beyond increasingly consider potable water recycling an important water management strategy. Although potable water recycling can increase an ... -
.
.
.
Statistical studies concerning the distribution of mining districts and mineral deposits in Nevada
Horton, Robert C. (University of Nevada, Reno, 1965)No abstract provided.