If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact (firstname.lastname@example.org). We will work to respond to each request in as timely a manner as possible.
|Author||Hayes, Steven C.|
|Date of Issue||1996|
|Description||Two recent publications by Boelens and Sidman examined the weaknesses in Relational Frame Theory This paper responds to those criticisms. We argue that Relational Frame Theory offers a very similar but more general account than Boelens, and that Sidman is incorrect in arguing a priori that equivalencing cannot be learned by exemplars.|
|Title||Criticisms of relational frame theory: Implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations|
Files in this item
There are no files associated with this item.