JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site
may not work without it.
If you have any problems related to the accessibility of any content (or if you want to request that a specific publication be accessible), please contact (rohit@unr.edu). We will work to respond to each request in as timely a manner as possible.
Criticisms of relational frame theory: Implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations
Two recent publications by Boelens and Sidman examined the weaknesses in Relational Frame Theory This paper responds to those criticisms. We argue that Relational Frame Theory offers a very similar but more general account than Boelens, and that Sidman is incorrect in arguing a priori that equivalencing cannot be learned by exemplars.
University of Nevada, Reno
